# Talent Pronto Reviews — Customer & Candidate Feedback > 4.7 out of 5 — from 600+ candidate satisfaction surveys Honest reviews and feedback from the companies we help hire and the candidates we help get hired. Talent Pronto is an AI-powered hiring platform built around Anna, an AI interviewer that conducts 24/7 conversational candidate screening. Learn more at [talentpronto.ai](https://www.talentpronto.ai). ## Customers Get Results Real testimonials from the leaders and companies who hire with Talent Pronto. > "In engineering hiring, the biggest challenge is separating candidates who can actually do the job from those who just look good on paper. Talent Pronto's AI interviews candidates on technical skills, soft skills, and culture fit, so hiring teams can spend their time on the people worth talking to instead of sorting through hundreds of resumes." > > — **Andrew Myers**, VP of Engineering, Instant > "Talent Pronto cut our screening time by more than half and helped us identify qualified CNAs we would have missed in manual resume reviews. We're filling positions faster with candidates who actually have the skills and qualities we need." > > — **Lou Donaldson**, CEO, TLC Caregivers > "We are growing rapidly and need to hire quickly. Anna allows our team to spend time on the best candidates instead of busywork. What used to take days of back-and-forth scheduling and screening now happens automatically." > > — **Mark Lewis**, CFO, Krilogy > "Finding the right talent has always been challenging. Now with the influx of applications, it is even harder. Talent Pronto streamlines the process and helps identify top candidates in minutes rather than months." > > — **Tad Ihns**, CEO, Stratajess Technologies > "Finding good people is the hardest part of running a small business. With Talent Pronto, we spend less time sorting through applicants and more time focused on what we do best — selling great pizza." > > — **Laura Pinzone**, Owner, Papa's Pizza ## …And Candidates Love the Experience Recent responses from our candidate satisfaction surveys, in their own words — the critical ones included. - **4.7 / 5** average rating - **95%** rated it 4 or 5 stars - **600+** candidates surveyed - **100%** of applicants get a real interview - ★★★★★ "I really enjoyed interviewing this way. It allowed me to get my thoughts in order and provide thoughtful responses." — Product Manager Candidate (verified survey response, July 2026) - ★★★★★ "Love this better than an initial phone screening!" — Product Manager Candidate (verified survey response, July 2026) - ★★★★★ "This is the first time I've ever done this process and I appreciate Anna being able to answer my questions very quickly" — Product Manager Candidate (verified survey response, July 2026) - ★★★★★ "The experience felt modern and surprisingly personal, while still being efficient and easy to navigate. From a technology perspective, the conversation was seamless and intuitive, without feeling clunky or overly automated." — VP of Marketing Candidate (verified survey response, July 2026) - ★★★★★ "This is the first time that I have done a job application like this and I found it to be a very refreshing approach to the process!" — Outreach Educator Candidate (verified survey response, July 2026) - ★★★★★ "The interview experience was engaging and conversational. I appreciated having the opportunity to explain my experience instead of relying solely on my resume. The questions were relevant to the role and allowed me to demonstrate how my background aligns with the position. Thank you for creating a thoughtful application process." — Client Solutions Candidate (verified survey response, July 2026) - ★★★★★ "This was an interesting way to interview! Anna kinda made me feel like i was chatting with a real person." — Health Facility Evaluator Candidate (verified survey response, July 2026) - ★★★★★ "This AI chat bot's overall tone was friendly and professional without sounding robotic." — Client Solutions Candidate (verified survey response, July 2026) - ★★★★★ "I enjoyed this type of evaluation over the 50 question type. The interaction was helpful to stay on track!" — Health Facility Evaluator Candidate (verified survey response, July 2026) - ★★★★★ "I liked the process and think it was helpful to be able to thoughtfully respond to your questions." — VP of Marketing Candidate (verified survey response, July 2026) - ★★★★★ "I have never had an interview session/ job application like this one before. I liked it!" — Health Facility Evaluator Candidate (verified survey response, July 2026) - ★☆☆☆☆ "Bring back human screening please" — Product Manager Candidate (verified survey response, July 2026) - ★★★★★ "I very much appreciate the thought put into this first part of the process. Even though it was an AI bot, having some level of interaction with feedback along the way that Anna was understanding was very helpful. Thank you for the time you put into the process from the very start." — Client Solutions Candidate (verified survey response, July 2026) - ★★★★★ "It was a good experience" — Customer Service Candidate (verified survey response, July 2026) - ★★★★★ "This was a great way to start communication." — Customer Service Candidate (verified survey response, July 2026) - ★★★★★ "Very smooth process." — VP of Marketing Candidate (verified survey response, July 2026) - ★★★★☆ "I didn't think much of my healthcare background would translate so well, but I'm amazed there are multiple bridges." — Client Solutions Candidate (verified survey response, July 2026) - ★★★★★ "Great experience overall. The questions were relevant to the role, the conversation felt natural, and the process was easy to follow. Thank you for the opportunity." — Client Solutions Candidate (verified survey response, July 2026) - ★★★★★ "Good for the first time doing this experience." — Health Facility Evaluator Candidate (verified survey response, July 2026) - ★★★★☆ "Easy to use and quick response time" — Health Facility Evaluator Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "Overall, this was one of the better application experiences I've had. The questions were thoughtful and relevant to the role, allowing me to explain not only what I've accomplished but also how I approach operational challenges and decision-making. The conversational format felt much more engaging than a traditional application, and I especially appreciated the personal outreach encouraging me to complete the process. Thank you for the opportunity." — Operations Director Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I like this process. While I'm sure it still may keep a few candidates out of the running, it was nice to at least feel like I was being acknowledged." — Client Solutions Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "The interview was great, there was no pressure because I couldn't see Anna." — Caregiver Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★☆☆ "I would still prefer to interview with a human, but this was interesting." — Solar Technician Candidate (verified survey response, July 2026) - ★★★★★ "I appreciated having the time to think through my responses. It took off some of the pressure and anxiety that comes with a traditional interview" — Health Facility Evaluator Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "All seemed to go as prescribed. It was a pleasure." — Welding Engineer Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I liked having time to consider my answers without an interviewer waiting in-person." — Registered Nurse Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★☆ "The process was less stressful." — Registered Nurse Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "That was probably the best interview I have experienced. Talking to Anna felt like talking to a flesh-and-blood human. On top of that I greatly appreciate that it felt very casual and relaxed. It wasn't stiff and nerve-wracking like many interviews. Because of that I felt more at ease and better able to open up. The questions were also an excellent balance. They were thought provoking questions, but at the same time not so in depth and off the wall that they became uncomfortable to dwell on. It honestly felt somewhat challenging to the point that it wasn't boring, but not so challenging that it caused any actual stress. The interview was actually quite enjoyable." — Registered Nurse Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★☆ "Doesnt feel too AI-ish but its nice and quick and easy." — Customer Service Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★☆ "This was my first time doing this type of interview and I liked it" — Customer Service Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I enjoyed the interview." — Customer Service Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I like that I was able to write my answers." — Health Facility Evaluator Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★☆ "Very interested in position." — Health Facility Evaluator Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★☆ "I thought it was nice to have the opportunity to think about the questions carefully and type out my responses. There's nothing worse than ending an interview and realizing you forgot something. That said, it does take a bit longer, and I felt like I needed to include more details because there was less back-and-forth to guide the conversation." — Product Manager Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★☆ "Have never had this experience. I liked it but still in the interview process its much nicer to communicate with a human that works at or is representing the company." — VP of Marketing Candidate (verified survey response, July 2026) - ★★★★★ "I appreciated the ability to answer questions using my real-time experience." — Health Facility Evaluator Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I truly enjoyed interviewing with Anna. She definitely was informative. She was prompt. She was very informative very accurate and I enjoyed my time interviewing with her." — Customer Service Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "Impressive" — Museum Professional Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "Very good, I liked it!" — VP of Marketing Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "Lengthy questions... I liked you get your questions asked quickly. Great job!" — Customer Service Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I liked the AI interview because it gave me a better idea of the position and helped me think about what to expect in a real interview setting. However, I still prefer human interaction because it feels more personal and engaging. Overall, I think the AI interview is a helpful first step in the hiring process." — English Instructor Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I felt comfortable with this interview" — Registered Nurse Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "This took the anxiety out of the typical interview process and allowed for me to actually consider my responses instead of blurting out the first thing that came to my mind." — English Instructor Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I feel the questionnaire process was appropriate to the position I currently hold." — Health Facility Evaluator Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I'll share that I actually appreciated this format. I've had mixed experiences with AI-driven screening, but this felt more useful and conversational than a one-way AI phone screen. The prompts were relevant, the follow-up questions made sense based on my answers, and it gave me room to explain the parts of my background that connect most directly to the role. From a candidate perspective, I also appreciated that it focused on substance: revenue impact, sales alignment, demand generation, and where I would need to ramp. That made the experience feel more like an early-stage conversation than a generic screening exercise." — VP of Marketing Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★☆ "This is a very unique idea and I found it much more enjoyable than answering these questions during the initial application process." — Customer Service Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★☆☆ "This interview was overall a fine experience but the impersonalness of Anna and her inability to answer any follow-up questions does feel a small bit counterintuitive to the interview process." — Health Facility Evaluator Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I loved the over the internet interview." — Customer Service Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "This was a good experience over all, Thank you!" — Customer Service Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "Looking forward to the opportunity" — Customer Service Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "Looking forward to next steps." — VP of Marketing Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "This was actually great with Anna! I was able to fully think about my response before just saying the first thing that came to my mind." — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "One of the best AI experiences I've had." — Museum Professional Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I wish Anna was able to answer more of my questions regarding the position since I'm super excited about the role and want to learn more. Overall, it was a wonderful interviewing experience!" — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "Easy and Comfortable" — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "Very good for a hiring product. I've seen these products entirely break during production, so I just wanted to say it was very, very good overall." — Product Manager Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "It was great!" — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "Great experience, no hassle good questions and fast responses!" — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★☆☆ "This is no replacement for a real person, but I can see the value of having this as an additional mid-step between the application and the in-person interview." — English Instructor Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I thought it was great. I can sell insurance but I am typically bad at interviews so that helped things." — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I appreciate Anna taking time out of the day to get more information about my working experience, and hopes for the future" — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "Great experience" — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I liked the process. Seemed very straightforward and it was concise." — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★☆ "This was my first experience using an AI screening tool for interviews." — Marketing Manager Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "Thank you for this experience and your interest in my qualifications. I am hoping it is a good match for you too." — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "No perfect set up everything works great no bugs and very quick and efficient" — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "First time having an AI interview. It was very enjoyable showcasing my skills without the fear of being judged." — Solar Technician Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "The interview experience was smooth and much better than a typical job application process. Anna made it easy to communicate my experience clearly, and the process felt efficient and respectful of my time. The interview was shorter than expected, but still covered the key areas well. Overall, it was a positive experience." — Engineer Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I felt so at ease! I'm a terrible in-person interviewer!" — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "This was a unique experience and I enjoyed it" — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★☆☆☆ "AI can be effective for streamlining recruiting, but it can also limit a candidate's ability to provide context and nuance around their experience. Human reviewers are often better able to recognize transferable skills, growth potential, and unique career experiences that may not be immediately apparent through automated screening criteria." — Product Manager Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "It was a very natural feeling interview. I wouldn't change anything" — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I love the encouragement and summary feedback. The dynamics provide a warm and positive experience." — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "Everything went well, great response time" — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "Loved it ty" — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "This is my first experience with this type of prescreening interview. Loved it!" — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "It was great," — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I did like the process, it was very interesting interviewing this way." — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "Felt almost real!" — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I think this is an excellent way to hire. I received an email at 10:00pm my time and completed the screening before midnight. Quite a productive few hours." — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I love this new take on interviewing. I really enjoyed this experience vs traditional interviewing." — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I love this" — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★☆☆☆ "This is my first AI interview and it was not great. The system lags and it takes a lot longer to type out your answers rather than tell them to a live person. If you dont answer in the exact way that it wants it doesn't understand you. Everything has to be very calculated and formulated." — Marketing Manager Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I think Anna makes you less nervous and gives you time to think about your true answers." — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "Anna made this interview very effective. Ty for the opportunity." — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I wish every screening was like this!" — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "Everything was great!" — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I have never answered interview questions in an interactive manner like this before. This was very enjoyable." — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★☆ "Agentic AI is revolutionizing this process. I'm for it!" — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "It was a neat way to boost excitement and hope while on the job search. A plus for feel good!" — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "It felt like chatting with a real person." — Insurance Agent Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★☆ "It was a good process!" — IT Specialist Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "It was good questions" — Caregiver Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I'm excited to start working with you guys!" — Customer Service Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★☆☆☆☆ "Humans should interview humans" — Product Manager Candidate (verified survey response, May 2026) - ★★★★★ "It was a fun experience!" — Marketing Manager Candidate (verified survey response, June 2026) - ★★★★★ "I really enjoyed this interview as it felt more engaging than past AI interviews I have done." — Marketing Manager Candidate (verified survey response, May 2026) - ★★★★★ "I appreciated the ability to demonstrate my skills with the interactive approach." — IT Specialist Candidate (verified survey response, May 2026) - ★★★★★ "Fully satisfied with the Questions and responses." — Product Manager Candidate (verified survey response, May 2026) - ★★★★★ "I enjoyed this experience because it was low-pressure, and I had the opportunity to truly concentrate on my answers 100%, as opposed to simultaneously building rapport with someone new, structuring my experiences and recalling situations, to answer questions." — Marketing Manager Candidate (verified survey response, May 2026) - ★★★★★ "Appreciate the opportunity to apply for this position on this excellent company" — Solar Technician Candidate (verified survey response, May 2026) - ★★★★☆ "I enjoyed the process and relaxed environment this type of interview provided." — Sales Director Candidate (verified survey response, May 2026) - ★★★★★ "I loved being able to write my answers! It helped me be a little more cohesive and thoughtful. Thank you for making this available!" — Marketing Manager Candidate (verified survey response, May 2026) - ★★★★☆ "This is my first screening interview I've had with this method and it was surprisingly pleasant." — Marketing Manager Candidate (verified survey response, May 2026) - ★★★★★ "This was an amazing format that created a relaxed environment for applicants and gave them time to think without feeling the pressure of responding quickly." — HR Manager Candidate (verified survey response, May 2026) - ★★★★★ "I really enjoyed this interview process." — Dealer Support Candidate (verified survey response, May 2026) - ★★★★★ "Overall, this was a very thoughtful and engaging interview experience. I appreciated that the questions focused on real-world strategy, cross-functional collaboration, and problem-solving rather than just surface-level qualifications. The conversational format made it easier to provide detailed context around my experience, and the pacing felt appropriate throughout the process. I also appreciated the transparency around the role and the opportunity to think through practical product marketing scenarios. One area that could potentially improve the experience would be providing a little more visibility into the team structure or current business priorities earlier in the process, but overall I thought the experience was strong and well designed." — Marketing Manager Candidate (verified survey response, May 2026) - ★★★★★ "Loved this software. Wish more companies would adopt this solution. Saves time for both the applicant and an HR recruiter to have AI conduct an initial screening. Thanks!" — Marketing Manager Candidate (verified survey response, May 2026) - ★★★★★ "This was quite an experience and I enjoyed doing this." — HR Manager Candidate (verified survey response, May 2026) - ★★★★★ "Everything was great." — Caregiver Candidate (verified survey response, May 2026) - ★★★★☆ "Overall I thought it was a pleasant experience" — Wealth Services Candidate (verified survey response, May 2026) - ★★★★★ "I really appreciated how concise this process has been. Thank you for the opportunity." — Wealth Services Candidate (verified survey response, May 2026) - ★★★★★ "Straight forward and kept moving. Liked it." — Sales Director Candidate (verified survey response, April 2026) ## Worked with Talent Pronto? Whether you're a customer who hired through us or a candidate we placed, we'd love to hear about your experience: [leave a review](https://talentpronto-reviews.com/#leave-review). --- © 2026 Talent Pronto Reviews · [talentpronto.ai](https://www.talentpronto.ai) · [HTML version](https://talentpronto-reviews.com/)